The Art Gallery of Leeds had the nominated artist's Pavel Bϋchler, Nick Crowe and Ian Rawlinson, Rachel Gooyear and Matt Stokes to offer when I visited. I'd come across one of them before, Rachel Goodyear, as she graciously gave my course a lecture upon her work the previous year.
Most of the work which I viewed was of Paval Buchler, who would go onto win the Competition and a cheque for £16,500. Nick Crowe won the public vote.





One piece that I particularly liked and peaked my interest was of the winner of the prize Pavel Buchler, entitled; 12:00:00 - 12:04:33, 17 October 2008.

This work consisted of a pocket watch inside a glass case on a plinth. What I Read from this work was that he was displaying a TIME. These seconds from existence on that date at that time. Perhaps the time of his life was being displayed in this case. The 4.33 seconds of existence of himself on the 17th of October 2008. It could be viewed to me as a self affirmation of being alive, in being able to display a snippet of his time 'alive'.
I have to say that on my part I would have wished Rachel Goodyear would have won, though this opinion is most likely biased due to former knowledge and encountering her work before. As well as knowing much more about her work from the lecture she gave my class. Aesthetically I would say Rachel Goodyears displayed art was the most traditional. Pavel Buchler being the most contemporary I believe. Though I'm not saying this accounts for his win.

This piece is especially to me as it highlights aspects of my own practice. I know that this is a very different thing that is being said though in contrast to my own work. Knowing some of Rachel's work, this is set in a world where this person may easily 'live' without a head to speak of, or speak from. Suggesting this may be a much more pure being than ourselves. Without a mind to cloud and distract the heart. Though what of the attire and the metal detector this headless free being holds? The piece is entitled Headless Hunter. Though what is this hunter hunting for? is it as simple as looking for his lost head? Is his head 'lost'? Rachel's title does suggest he is in fact headless as does the stump on his neck, but is this a bad thing? Freedom from the ever question and curious mind is likely quite the release. Although at what cost.
A Key work by the artists Ian Rawlinson & Nick Crowe was of High Definition Video loop, entitled Two Eternal Flames.
It shows, derived from myth and folklore, torches burning in two locations in Miami, USA: one represents US friendship with its neighbours, the other commemorates invasion. There is a soft calming feeling to the viewing of the piece as the torches slowly burn in the night-vision looking film. Not until looking into the flames themselves you feel some strong sense of violence and benevolence. The title suggest these flames will be forever burning, a quite frightening concept of the rage of the fire to last longer than our own beings, life being more subject to being extinguished than that of the primeval pure raw tongues of fire.
The Work I saw of Matt Stokes entitled 'These are the days, 2006-09' a two screened film depicting the sweaty, hard, ear throbbing of seeing a band and participating in the 'moshpit' of seeing them live.